The Self Realization Mantra is a radical five-part, post-nondual teaching. It does not resolve the apparent paradoxes of existence by eliminating one side of the equation. It realizes them all simultaneously.
The Self Realization Mantra is nondual. At the same time, I call it post-nondual because it begins with the realization of nonduality and then continues the inquiry rather than treating that realization as the end of the inquiry. Nonduality points beyond the apparent separation between self and other, subject and object, individual and universal. It reveals that what appear to be separate realities are not ultimately separate.
That realization is profound. But what happens after you realize it? Do you have to conclude that the individual self was never real? Do you have to throw away individuality in order to preserve universality? Do you have to choose emptiness over fullness, or transcendence over immanence?
The Self Realization Mantra says no. It doesn’t resolve the paradox by eliminating one side of the equation. It holds the entire equation.
The Self Realization Mantra is:
I Am Thee Iself.
I Am Thee Allself.
I Am Thee Godself.
I Am Thee Noself.
I Am Thee Amness.
These five lines point toward five realizations and five perspectives. They are not five separate realities. Iself, Allself, Godself, and Noself are four distinct expressions of Amness within Consciousness, while Amness is the source from which they arise. They are all realized simultaneously.
Nonduality Without Erasure
One of the things that distinguishes the Self Realization Mantra is that it does not require the Iself to be dismissed as an illusion in order to realize nonduality. The Iself is the individual focal point of conscious awareness, the first-person vantage point through which experience occurs. It is the “I” you mean when you say, “I am here.”
The ego can be seen through. Identification with the ego can be released. The constructed story of “me” can change. But that doesn’t mean the Iself has to be annihilated. The Iself is not the ego. I Am Thee Iself.
The Iself is the doorway through which every realization is experienced. Even the realization of Noself is experienced from somewhere. This doesn’t make the Iself separate from everything else. It means individuality and nonduality can coexist. The realization of nonduality does not require the destruction of individuality. Transcending identification is not the same thing as annihilating the individual.
The distinction between individuality and universality can remain even when the sense of separation between them falls away. The distinctions remain. The separation does not.
Duality and Polarity
This is where the distinction between duality and polarity becomes important. Duality implies two separate and opposing realities: self and other, subject and object, light and dark, individual and universal. In a dualistic framework, the two sides are fundamentally separate.
Polarity is different. A polarity consists of apparently opposite expressions of a single source. Think of a magnet. It has a north pole and a south pole. They are distinguishable, but they aren’t two separate magnets. You cannot isolate one pole and still have the same magnetic system. The apparent opposites belong to one whole.
The Self Realization Mantra treats Iself, Allself, Godself, and Noself in a similar way. They are distinct, but they are not separate. Iself is individual. Allself is universal. Godself is divine. Noself is empty. Those sound contradictory if we assume that only one of them can be true, but contradiction isn’t the only possibility. They can be polarities arising from Amness within Consciousness.
This is why I don’t describe the four selves as a four-way duality. They are a four-way polarity—four differentiated expressions arising from Amness within Consciousness. Amness is the source of all four.
Iself and Allself
The first apparent paradox is the relationship between Iself and Allself: I Am Thee Iself and I Am Thee Allself. From the Iself perspective, I am this particular person. I have this body, this history, this perspective, this set of relationships, and this particular stream of experience.
From the Allself perspective, that boundary expands. The distinction between “me” and “everything else” dissolves. Consciousness is experienced as universal rather than merely individual. These aren’t competing descriptions. I can be a wave and still be the ocean. The wave doesn’t have to disappear for the ocean to be realized. In fact, without the wave, there is no particular expression of the ocean in that location.
Individuality is an expression of universality, not a contradiction of it.
Iself and Godself
Another apparent paradox is the relationship between I Am Thee Iself and I Am Thee Godself. The Iself is the individual focal point of conscious awareness, while the Godself is the divine creative principle. One seems personal and individual; the other seems divine and universal. How can the individual self be the Godself?
The distinction becomes clearer when we stop thinking of Godself as an external deity. The Godself is not a separate being somewhere outside of you. It is the divine creative principle expressing itself through consciousness and manifestation. The Iself is the individual focal point through which that divine principle is experienced and expressed.
From the Iself perspective, I am doing something. From the Godself perspective, God is doing everything. These are radically different perspectives, yet the Self Realization Mantra doesn’t require one to be discarded in order to realize the other.
The individual does not have to disappear for the divine to be realized. The Iself can be understood as a particular expression and focalization of the Godself, while the Godself reveals the deeper creative power operating through the individual.
This creates another polarity: the individual and the divine are distinct, but not separate. I Am Thee Iself. I Am Thee Godself. Both are true, and neither cancels the other.
Iself and Noself
The apparent paradox becomes even more extreme with Iself and Noself: I Am Thee Iself and I Am Thee Noself. How can I be somebody and nobody?
From the Iself perspective, I am somebody. There is a first-person center of experience. From the Noself perspective, there is no separate somebody to be found. There is emptiness—no fixed identity, no permanent conceptual self, no thing that can be grasped as the ultimate “me.”
The mistake is assuming that one realization has to invalidate the other. The Iself is real as the individual focal point of awareness. The Noself is real as the realization of transcendent emptiness. Somebody and nobody are not mutually exclusive when viewed from different perspectives of the same reality. That is the post-nondual move.
Allself and Noself
Then there is the biggest apparent contradiction: I Am Thee Allself and I Am Thee Noself. Everything and nothing. Fullness and emptiness. The totality of manifestation and the absence of manifestation. At first glance, these appear to cancel each other out.
But the Self Realization Mantra doesn’t ask us to choose. Allself is the realization of Everythingness—the infinite multiplicity of existence, every being, every form, every moment. Noself is the realization of Nothingness—the absence of any fixed thing, identity, or conceptual boundary. Everythingness and Nothingness are opposite poles of the same mystery. The fullness doesn’t cancel the emptiness, and the emptiness doesn’t cancel the fullness. Both are realized.
Noself and Godself
The paradox continues with I Am Thee Godself and I Am Thee Noself. Godself is the divine creative principle—the power through which manifestation happens. Noself is the absence of manifestation. One is radically expressive, while the other is radically empty.
Yet the Self Realization Mantra places them side by side because Godself and Noself describe different dimensions arising from the same source. Godself is the doing; Noself is the nothingness in which there is nothing to do. And Amness is prior to both.
Amness Changes the Equation
The fifth line changes everything: I Am Thee Amness.
Amness is not another self. It isn’t a fifth version of “me.” Amness is pure unmanifest beingness—the source of self and the source of consciousness. It is prior to Being, prior to Consciousness, prior to identity, and prior to the distinction between something and nothing.
This introduces an entirely different set of paradoxes.
The first is Iself and Amness. The Iself is the individual focal point of consciousness, while Amness is prior to consciousness and prior to self. How can the individual self be that which is prior to self? I Am Thee Amness points beyond the identity of the Iself to the source from which the very possibility of self arises.
Then there is Allself and Amness. Allself is Everythingness—the totality of manifestation. Amness is prior to manifestation itself. How can everything be that which exists before anything exists? The answer is not to collapse Allself into Amness. Allself is the fullness of manifestation; Amness is the unmanifest source from which that fullness arises.
There is also Godself and Amness. Godself is the divine creative principle—the power through which manifestation happens. Amness is prior to creation and therefore prior to the creative principle itself. Godself is the divine doing; Amness is prior to doing.
And finally, there is Noself and Amness. Noself is Nothingness—the absence of fixed self, identity, form, and conceptual content. Amness is pure unmanifest beingness. Nothingness and beingness may appear to be opposites, but Amness is prior to the distinction between something and nothing.
This is why Amness is not simply another perspective alongside the other four. Amness is the source of the four perspectives themselves.
The four selves arise as differentiated expressions within Consciousness, while Amness is the source from which they arise. Iself, Allself, Godself, and Noself are not divisions of reality. They are distinct expressions arising from Amness within Consciousness.
So the movement of the mantra is not simply a movement from I to Everything to God to Nothing to something else. It is a movement through increasingly fundamental perspectives of reality.
And ultimately, there is Amness. No “I.” No thing. No identity. No consciousness. Pure beingness before Being. Simply Amness.
Why “Post-Nondual”?
This is why I use the term post-nondual. The Self Realization Mantra does not reject nonduality. It begins with it. But it doesn’t treat the realization of nonduality as the end of the inquiry.
It asks: What happens when you realize nonduality and then look again at everything that nonduality seemed to make disappear?
The individual is still here. The universal is still here. The divine is still here. Emptiness is still here. And underneath all of it is Amness.
Rather than saying, “Only one of these is ultimately real,” the Self Realization Mantra says, realize them all. This is why I call it a radical five-part nonduality. It is nondual because the five are not ultimately separate. It is post-nondual because it does not require the apparent distinctions to be erased.
The distinctions remain. The separation does not.
The Paradoxes Are the Feature
The Self Realization Mantra contains paradoxes everywhere: Iself versus Allself, Iself versus Godself, Iself versus Noself, Allself versus Noself, Noself versus Godself, and all four in relationship to Amness.
A conventional approach might try to resolve these paradoxes by deciding which side is ultimately real and which side is merely appearance. The Self Realization Mantra takes a different approach. The paradoxes are not a bug. They’re a feature.
The apparent contradictions are pointing toward something that cannot be captured by choosing one perspective and rejecting another. I am somebody, I am everybody, I am God, I am nobody, and I simply am. These statements don’t have to compete. They can be simultaneously realized.
Five Perspectives
After all of this philosophy, the five perspectives can be expressed very simply. From the Iself perspective, you are somebody going somewhere doing something. From the Allself perspective, you are everybody going everywhere doing everything. From the Godself perspective, God is doing everything. From the Noself perspective, you are nobody going nowhere doing nothing. From the Amness perspective, you simply am.
Each perspective reveals something that the others cannot fully express, and none of them cancels the others. That is the heart of the Self Realization Mantra.
Beyond Choosing
Maybe the deepest difference between the Self Realization Mantra and a conventional nondual approach is that the Self Realization Mantra doesn’t ask you to choose between the poles. You don’t have to choose Iself over Allself, Allself over Iself, Godself over Noself, or Noself over Godself. You don’t have to choose manifestation over the unmanifest, or the unmanifest over manifestation.
You realize the whole thing.
The Iself is real. The Allself is real. The Godself is real. The Noself is real. And Amness is the source of them all.
That is not a return to duality. It is what remains when the need to resolve every polarity into one side or the other has been transcended.
The Self Realization Mantra is not asking you to choose between Iself, Allself, Godself, Noself, and Amness. It is asking you to realize them all simultaneously.
Leave a Reply